Special Aspects of Treatment of Joint Dysfunction


Joint Dysfunction, Part 2
Home

 

CHAPTER 2

To read Chapter 3, click this link:  http://www.doctoryourself.com/kaufman8.html

To return to Chapter 1: http://www.doctoryourself.com/kaufman6.html

 

THE COMMON FORM OF JOINT DYSFUNCTION
by William Kaufman, M.D., Ph.D. (1949)
Copyright C 2001 Charlotte Kaufman. Reprinted with permission.
Edited by Andrew W. Saul

(Dr. Kaufman now discusses physical and psychological stresses, allergy, posture, obesity and other factors that may interact or interfere with niacinamide megavitamin therapy for arthritis. This chapter’s three original photographs are not provided here, but may be seen in the original text, available through this website. For ordering information, you may either click here or scroll to the very bottom of this webpage.)

References cited in this chapter are posted at http://www.doctoryourself.com/kaufman11.html

Four Complicating Syndromes Frequently Coexisting with Joint Dysfunction

It might appear to the reader that the niacinamide treatment of a patient with joint 
dysfunction is a more or less mechanical and uninteresting procedure. However, in 
practice, the treatment of a patient with joint dysfunction is never a mechanical or dull 
routine, since therapy of joint dysfunction and commonly occurring complicating 
syndromes must always be adapted to the special needs of the individual patient. For 
the most part, the treatment of a patient with joint dysfunction is a constantly interesting 
and instructive discipline both for the patient and physician. 

Commonly occurring complicating syndromes coexisting with joint dysfunction must 
often be corrected if the patient is to be able and willing to take niacinamide therapy as 
prescribed, and if he is to feel well ultimately. Even though joint dysfunction improves to 
the level of 96-100 (no joint dysfunction) in response to adequate niacinamide therapy, 
the patient may have continuing articular and non-articular symptoms, of one or more of 
these complicating syndromes, and he may erroneously conclude that the niacinamide 
treatment of his joint dysfunction has failed. On the other hand, whether or not a patient 
is taking niacinamide treatment, when these complicating syndromes are corrected, he 
may have an improved sense of well-being and freedom from articular and non-articular 
symptoms, but it does not follow necessarily that his joint dysfunction is improving, since 
serial re-measurements of his Joint Range Index may indicate that his joint dysfunction 
may be unimproved or worsened. 

In the treatment of a patient with joint dysfunction who has one or more of four 
complicating syndromes frequently coexisting with joint dysfunction, the physician must 
correctly identify the basis of the patient's articular and non-articular symptoms, and 
must institute concurrently the appropriate specific therapy required for the successful 
management of joint dysfunction and any of these four syndromes which the patient 
may have: 

(a) the delayed post-traumatic articular syndrome (see page 79);
(b) the chronic allergic syndromes (page 96);
(c) the sodium retention syndrome (page 114);
(d) the syndrome of psychogenically induced, sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle 
(page 115).

The articular symptoms of any one or any combination of these four syndromes may be 
present in a patient without joint dysfunction, or may be absent in a patient with joint 
dysfunction (with or without clinically obvious arthritis); and may occur in a patient with 
joint dysfunction before niacinamide therapy is instituted, during the course of adequate 
niacinamide therapy, when adequate niacinamide therapy is replaced by inadequate 
niacinamide therapy or upon premature cessation of niacinamide therapy. The articular 
and non-articular symptoms of bodily discomfort of these four syndromes may vary in 
intensity, duration and extensiveness. With each of these syndromes a patient may 
have a steady state of discomfort which persists until the syndrome is successfully 
treated.

The four complicating syndromes frequently coexisting with joint dysfunction will be 
described as if each were an independent clinical entity. Often, the successful 
management of any one of these syndromes will not materially influence the clinical 
course of the other untreated coexisting syndromes. At times, however, these 
complicating syndromes may be interrelated, in the sense that when one of the 
untreated complicating syndromes becomes more severe, the other coexisting 
untreated complicating syndromes also become more severe; and in the sense that the 
successful treatment of one of the complicating syndromes may simultaneously amel-
iorate or lessen the intensity of symptoms of the other untreated coexisting complicating 
syndromes. Clinically, it may be very easy, or it may be extremely difficult, to ascertain 
the etiologic basis of the patient's articular and non-articular symptoms. The most 
helpful clues to the etiology of the patient's symptoms are obtained from careful clinical 
study, including a detailed history of the onset and development of symptoms, re-
examination of the patient, an analysis of the food-symptom diary kept by the patient 
(see page 103), and an evaluation of the patient's response to a trial of therapy directed 
toward the amelioration of the symptoms of a given complicating syndrome.

Although from the physician's point of view, the patient's symptoms are subjective 
phenomena, to the patient his symptoms are real and have objective existence. By 
giving verbal expression to his symptoms, the patient is exteriorizing the fact that he 
does not feel well, and implying that if his symptoms could be made to disappear, he 
would feel well.

The physician must give careful consideration to the possible meaning of all the 
patient's symptoms, whether or not they seem to be trivial, atypical or bizarre at the time 
of their recital. The physician should regard the patient's symptoms as direct or indirect 
clues to the nature of the patient's ill health, even if the clinical meaning of these 
symptoms continues to be inapparent. Once the etiology of the patient's symptoms is 
recognized by the physician, it often becomes possible to institute appropriate treatment 
which, in time, ameliorates these symptoms. While the etiologic basis of some 
symptoms may be readily perceived by the physician, the clinical significance of other 
symptoms may remain obscure for a long time or may never be ascertained. Even 
some symptoms which at first hearing appear fantastic to the physician may prove, in 
time, to have a definite clinical basis which can be identified. When the nature of the 
patient's disorder becomes manifest, it is often found that most patients with puzzling 
symptoms were entirely accurate and honest in their reporting of symptoms. It is the 
rare patient who deliberately distorts facts and invents complaints and illnesses, and 
even such a patient by so doing gives valuable clues to the nature of his illness.

In evaluating the clinical significance of articular and non-articular symptoms, it is 
necessary to remember that the patient's prevailing emotional state influences the 
nature of his complaints (29) (182) (242). A patient who is mildly depressed may 
complain at great length about his various symptoms, and may express considerable 
doubt that he will ever get well. On the other hand, a patient who is euphoric will 
complain little or not at all of articular and non-articular symptoms, and his general atti-
tude toward all of his life situations will be optimistic. A patient who has feelings of 
anxiety, guilt, hostility or frustration may find substitute satisfaction in complaining 
bitterly about articular and non-articular symptoms. A patient whose attention is fixed on 
his symptoms will have many complaints excepting when his attention is distracted by 
more interesting matters. A patient with a rigid conception of his own perfection seldom 
will complain of symptoms. Occasionally, a patient unconsciously attempts to gain the 
approval of the physician by exaggerating his favorable response to therapy. On the 
other hand, a patient may use his complaints about poor health to "punish" the 
physician (authoritarian figure) by insisting with evident satisfaction that his health has 
been unimproved or worsened by treatment, when it is obvious from physical 
examination and from the remainder of the patient's story that he has in fact improved 
physically. At times, when a patient has secondary gains from his illness, he seems 
impelled to complain about his symptoms, and even when he has improved as a result 
of treatment and has fewer symptoms, he continues to complain more and more about 
less and less.

DELAYED POST-TRAUMATIC ARTICULAR SYNDROME
(In this section, there is excluded from discussion such severe accidental injuries as 
lacerations of the supporting structures of joints, bone fractures involving joint 
structures, torn articular cartilages causing internal derangement of joints, and 
penetrating joint wounds.)

Without knowledge of the clinical patterns of the delayed post-traumatic articular 
syndrome, the cause of many articular symptoms and signs often remains obscure. 
With knowledge of such patterns, and with knowledge of the patient's physical activities, 
occupation, and emotional tensions, the physician can often identify the basis for the 
patient's troublesome articular symptoms and signs, and can advise the patient how to 
modify his way of living so that in the future he will be less likely to experience such 
symptoms and signs.

The delayed post-traumatic articular syndrome is the consequence of certain types of 
mechanical joint injury: 

(a) articular trauma which is likely to occur in the course of more or less ordinary 
physical activity; 

(b) alterations in the alignment of joints due to certain acquired habits of posture, or 
indirectly due to niacinamide-induced improvement in joint mobility;

(c) psychogenically induced, sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle.

In general, the severity of the patient's delayed post-traumatic articular symptoms 
seems to depend on the following factors: the clinical grade of severity of his joint 
dysfunction; the severity, repetitiveness and duration of the inciting mechanical joint 
injury; the patient's prevailing moods; and his attitudes toward his symptoms and life 
situations.

Mechanical joint injury may be well tolerated by persons with the milder grades of joint 
dysfunction, who will have either no clinically discernible articular sequelae or will 
develop relatively mild symptoms and signs of the delayed post-traumatic articular 
syndrome for relatively short periods of time; but mechanical joint injury usually is poorly 
tolerated by persons with the more severe clinical grades of joint dysfunction, who tend 
to develop severe symptoms and signs of the delayed post-traumatic articular syndrome 
which last for relatively long periods of time (97). In general, immediate and delayed 
post-traumatic articular symptoms and signs tend to be more severe in untreated 
persons with joint dysfunction than in persons with joint dysfunction who are receiving 
adequate amounts of niacinamide. A patient with joint dysfunction who is receiving 
inadequate niacinamide therapy is more likely to suffer from the delayed post-traumatic 
articular syndrome than if he were receiving adequate niacinamide therapy. If his 
niacinamide intake is increased from inadequate to adequate levels, even though 
mechanical joint injury continues at the same level as previously, the niacinamide-
induced reparative process will often preponderate over the trauma-induced 
deteriorative process, and the delayed articular post-traumatic syndrome will be 
ameliorated.

The immediate effects of a single episode of extremely severe joint injury are well 
understood because of the close temporal relationship between the articular injury and 
the ensuing articular symptoms of discomfort, pain and disability, which may be 
associated with one or more of the following physical signs in the mechanically injured 
joint region: tenderness to palpation, swelling, heat, redness, congestion of the 
superficial circumarticular veins, spasm of somatic muscles operating the injured joint, 
and painful or painless limitation of active and passive articular movement. The delayed 
effects of such severe mechanical joint injury may include a continuance of articular 
discomfort, pain and disability lasting for months or years, and clinically well-defined 
arthritic changes in the injured joints (33) (121) (19) (131).

The immediate effects of a single episode of a less severe grade of mechanical joint 
injury are also well understood, but the delayed effects of such an injury to the joints 
have not been given the clinical attention they deserve. Because there is often an 
asymptomatic period of two to four days between the subsidence of the immediate post-
traumatic articular symptoms and the appearance of the delayed post-traumatic articular 
syndrome, the physician and patient may be unable to perceive the causal relationship 
between the inciting mechanical joint injury and the delayed post-traumatic articular 
symptoms. When the delayed post-traumatic symptoms of joint discomfort, pain and 
disability occur three or four days after the inciting joint injury, there may be one or more 
of the following objective findings in the injured articular regions: tenderness to 
palpation, swelling, heat, redness, congestion of the superficial circumarticular veins, 
spasm of the somatic muscles operating the injured joint, and painful or painless 
limitation of active and passive articular movement. These delayed post-traumatic 
articular symptoms and signs may be more severe and more persistent than those 
occurring immediately after joint injury, and gradually decrease in severity, usually 
disappearing by the tenth to fourteenth day following the inciting injury to the joint. 
Occasionally, the delayed post-traumatic articular syndrome may persist for a month or 
more after a single joint injury, particularly when the patient's joint dysfunction is 
extremely severe, or when the inciting trauma is unusually great. At times, there may be 
no articular symptoms and signs immediately following mechanical joint injury, or such 
immediate articular symptoms as may appear immediately after the injury may seem so 
insignificant to the patient that he disregards them. Sometimes, the only sign of the 
delayed post-traumatic articular syndrome may be increased painless limitation in the 
ranges of movement of the injured joint. Even relatively slight injury, when sufficiently 
repetitive, may lead, in time, to a steady state of articular discomfort, pain and disability, 
and to the appearance of clinically obvious arthritic deformities in the injured joint region 
(96).

Sometimes, the cause of delayed post-traumatic articular symptoms may be identified 
only with difficulty after a prolonged period of clinical study. When a patient with joint 
dysfunction suddenly experiences a single isolated episode of joint pain and disability, 
or gradually develops a persistent state of articular discomfort (with or without periodic 
exacerbations) or merely an asymptomatic lowering of the ranges of joint motion, 
careful clinical study may disclose the fact that in the performance of a particular 
physical act either once or repetitively, the patient inadvertently or unknowingly injured 
the affected joints, or may disclose the fact that the patient has developed 
psychogenically induced, sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle of sufficient severity 
to injure his joints. Joints used statically or dynamically in the performance of everyday 
activities may incur mechanical trauma sufficiently severe to cause a single episode of 
articular discomfort, pain and disability, or may incur mechanical trauma sufficiently 
severe and repetitive to cause a steady state of articular discomfort, pain and disability.

When a patient has joint dysfunction of a high clinical grade of severity, his articular 
structures are particularly vulnerable to lesser grades of joint trauma, which may give 
rise to the more severe and persistent symptoms and signs of the delayed post-
traumatic articular syndrome. When a patient is recovering satisfactorily from joint 
dysfunction in response to continuously adequate niacinamide therapy, and a specific 
joint is subjected to a single episode of moderate injury, usually there is temporarily a 
delayed post-traumatic decrease in the range of movement of this joint -with or without 
accompanying symptoms of the delayed post-traumatic articular syndrome - although 
his uninjured joints continue to improve at a satisfactory rate. If the articular injury is 
more or less continuous, the range of movement of the injured joint decreases, and, in 
time, tends to stabilize for as long as the niacinamide-induced reparative process bal-
ances the trauma-induced deteriorative process in the injured joint. At this time, an 
increase in the patient's niacinamide intake does not materially improve the range of 
movement of the continuously injured joint, except in some instances where previous 
levels of niacinamide treatment have been inadequate. However, a decrease in 
niacinamide intake causes the range of movement of the continuously injured joint to 
decrease at a more rapid rate than if adequate amounts of niacinamide were taken con-
tinuously.

The Joint Range Index may or may not be significantly depressed by the post-
traumatically decreased range of movement of a single joint. It is, therefore, necessary 
to analyze the component joint ranges which are measured for the computation of the 
Joint Range Index in order to observe which joints show post-traumatically decreased 
ranges of joint movement and which joints simultaneously have made satisfactory 
improvement in the ranges of joint movement for the period of observation during which 
the patient was ingesting continuously adequate amounts of niacinamide.

It is often possible to identify the type of behavior which caused mechanical injury of 
certain joints from an analysis of the distribution of joints with decreased ranges of 
movement and those with increased ranges of movement, and from knowledge of the 
patient and his physical activities and hobbies at various seasons of the year, and of his 
emotional tensions. For example, when the fingers of the right hand, right wrist and right 
shoulder
show decreased movement, and the patient has recently returned from a train trip, one 
can establish that the most likely cause of the decreased ranges of movement was the 
carrying of a suitcase. When mechanical articular injury is sufficiently generalized, there 
is a delayed post-traumatic decrease in the ranges of movement of the injured joints 
and in the Joint Range Index even though the patient with joint dysfunction is ingesting 
continuously adequate amounts of niacinamide; however, with cessation of joint injury 
there is usually a satisfactory rise in the Joint Range Index in response to adequate 
niacinamide therapy.

Certain physical activities have been identified as causes of the delayed post-traumatic 
articular syndrome in some patients at various times during this study, and include: 
sawing, planing, hammering, house-painting, weeding, spading, hoeing, spraying, 
hedge-clipping, lawn-mowing, bowling, sailing, rowing, paddling a canoe, fly-fishing, 
driving a car, knitting, crocheting, tatting, wringing of clothes, house-cleaning, cleaning, 
scrubbing floors, waxing floors. In some persons the repetitive performance of a 
physically awkward act may cause joint injury; e.g., the frequent daily use of a desk 
telephone with a short cord, which requires the user to twist his body into an awkward 
position each time he uses the telephone. In some patients, holding the joints in a fixed 
position and carrying moderate weights for relatively short or long periods of time may 
give rise to a delayed post-traumatic cycle of joint discomfort and disability; e.g., 
maintaining one knee and ankle fixed in an awkward position by sitting on the medial 
aspect of the ipsilateral heel, or sitting in a chair with the dorsum of the ipsilateral foot 
twisted behind one leg of the chair; hanging onto an overhead strap in a subway or bus; 
holding a knitting bag, handbag, shopping bag, brief-case, suitcase, or even holding a 
strong dog in leash. Similarly, certain jerky movements requiring the sudden exertion of 
extra muscular force will also give rise to a post-traumatic cycle of joint discomfort and 
disability; e.g., opening a window or drawer that "sticks," or loosening a stubborn jar 
cover with a strong steady twisting movement, or opening and closing a "tight" water 
faucet. Joint trauma may occur during the night when the patient maintains awkward 
sleeping postures for relatively long periods of time, particularly if he simultaneously has 
during sleep psychogenically induced, sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle. Certain 
recently acquired or old methods of walking which the patient habitually uses will cause 
injury to the knee and hip joints and will cause a steady state of symptoms of articular 
discomfort, pain and disability, and signs of impaired mobility of hip and knee joints.

Joint trauma may occur also when a patient with joint dysfunction (with or without 
clinicallv obvious arthritic deformities) has mental tensions which are exteriorized 
through psychogenically induced, sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle. Although 
such a patient may erroneously believe that he is completely relaxed, the coapting 
pressures exerted continuously against articular surfaces, and the accompanying 
tensions on periarticular structures often cause continuous joint trauma for as long as 
this sustained somatic muscle hypertonia persists. When psychogenically induced, sus-
tained hypertonia of somatic muscle is present and the patient uses his joints in 
everyday activities, there is joint trauma in excess of what would have occurred in the 
performance of these activities in the absence of sustained hypertonia of somatic 
muscle. Psychogenically induced, sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle in persons 
with the more severe grades of joint dysfunction may cause articular swelling, redness, 
increased congestion of the superficial circumarticular veins, increased heat, spasm of 
the somatic muscles operating the joints, stiffness, and limitation in the ranges of active 
and passive joint movement. In time, repetitive joint trauma from this source will favor 
the appearance of clinically obvious arthritic deformities. Ordinarily, the patient is 
unaware of his mental tensions and his psychogenically induced, sustained hypertonia 
of somatic muscle, although he is very aware of his symptoms due to the delayed post-
traumatic articular syndrome.

Many persons with joint dysfunction (with or without clinical or radiographic evidence of 
arthritic changes in joints) may be unaware of any articular discomfort or disorder until 
joint trauma gives rise to the delayed post-traumatic articular syndrome. The anxiety 
and mental tension developed by such patients as a result of this articular discomfort, 
pain and disability (particularly when a steady state of articular discomfort is reached)
often create secondary psychogenically induced, sustained hypertonia of somatic 
muscle which is sufficiently severe to perpetuate joint injury and its sequelae.

TREATMENT OF THE DELAYED POST-TRAUMATIC ARTICULAR SYNDROME

Treatment of the delayed post-traumatic articular syndrome should be directed toward 
preventing the joint traumata which produce this syndrome and toward giving the patient 
relief from whatever delayed post-traumatic articular symptoms he may have. Since 
joint injury may be caused by ordinary or unusual, essential or non-essential daily 
activities, it is not always possible to prevent articular trauma, even when the physical 
act producing joint injury is known. However, once the causation of mechanical joint 
injury is recognized, the patient should be advised how to keep joint injuries to a 
minimum in the performance of his essential everyday physical activities. A patient who 
understands the temporal and causal relationship between the mechanical joint injuries 
of everyday activities and the symptoms of the delayed post-traumatic articular syn-
drome is likely to modify his activities so that mechanical injury to his joints will be 
minimal and, when possible, to avoid those unessential physical activities which may 
actuate the delayed post-traumatic articular syndrome.

Many patients erroneously believe that "exercise loosens the joints." It is often 
necessary to demonstrate to a patient that after exercise his Joint Range Index and the 
ranges of movement of his exercised joints are depressed, sometimes for days or 
weeks. In patients who have the lesser clinical grades of joint dysfunction, such delayed 
post-traumatic depression of joint ranges may not be sufficiently severe or prolonged to 
warrant the interdiction by the physician of all unessential physical exercise. However, 
in patients who have the more severe clinical grades of joint dysfunction, such delayed 
post-traumatic depression of the joint ranges may be sufficiently marked and prolonged 
to impede satisfactory joint recovery in response to niacinamide therapy. For each 
patient, where possible, physical exercise should be adjusted so that the resultant joint
injury will not materially impede satisfactory niacinamide-induced recovery from joint 
dysfunction.

Although physically strenuous exercise may give some patients with the more severe 
grades of joint dysfunction temporary benefit through transient release of 
psychogenically induced, sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle, the joints are not 
benefited by such exercise. It may be desirable to permit a patient with unresolved 
mental tensions to continue to enjoy his strenuous physical exercise, since the 
advantages of obtaining transitory relief from sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle 
may outweigh the disadvantages of actuating the post-traumatic articular syndrome. 
However, in time, with satisfactory psychotherapeutic resolution of his emotional 
tensions, the patient usually is relieved of his psychogenically induced, sustained 
hypertonia of somatic muscle, and consequently does not have the urgent need for 
seeking emotional release through excessive physical activity.

The more niacinamide-induced recovery a patient has had from his initial clinical grade 
of joint dysfunction, the better he will be able to tolerate the articular trauma of his 
everyday activities. The substitution of inadequate for adequate niacinamide therapy, or 
the premature cessation of adequate niacinamide therapy, tends to make the delayed 
post-traumatic syndrome more severe. Continuously adequate niacinamide therapy 
helps to minimize the symptoms and signs of the delayed post-traumatic articular 
syndrome but does not prevent their occurrence.

The use of plain or enteric coated aspirin (0.3 to 0.6 g per dose) or enteric coated 
sodium salicylate (0.6 g per dose) distributed as needed during the day - in a person 
having no intolerance for these drugs - often gives the patient relief from his localized or 
generalized post-traumatic articular symptoms. Rarely, for the relief of articular pain, it is 
necessary to give additionally codeine (0.030 to 0.060 g per dose) or demerol (0.100 to 
0.150 g per dose), as required. Procaine hydrochloride infiltration of an injured joint 
region has not been used (33) (211), nor were intravenous procaine hydrochloride 
injections used (63).

Relative rest of the injured joints tends to hasten recovery from the delayed post-
traumatic articular syndrome, provided that there is daily movement of the joint, without 
weight-bearing, through the fullest possible ranges of active and passive movement. 
When the delayed posttraumatic articular syndrome occurs in a given joint region, it is 
often helpful to apply massive hot, wet, Epsom salt dressings (for 30 minutes 3 or 4 
times daily) to a large region, including and surrounding the injured joint. Moist heat 
seems to be more efficacious than dry heat, although it is often more convenient to use 
dry heat (heating pad, or heat from an electric incandescent bulb). With the use of moist 
or dry heat special care must be taken not to burn the patient. Certain types of massage 
administered to injured articular regions may be helpful in giving some patients 
subjective relief from localized post-traumatic articular symptoms. A patient who injures 
his joints and develops generalized delayed post-traumatic articular symptoms may 
have temporary relief from these symptoms by soaking in a tepid bath for 20 or 30 
minutes. In selected instances, a suitable type of body massage following the bath may 
give additional benefit.

MISCELLANEOUS TYPES OF MECHANICAL JOINT INJURY AND THEIR 
TREATMENT

Posture. Certain types of posture in sitting, standing; walking and working cause 
mechanical joint injury, regardless of the patient's clinical grade of joint dysfunction, 
whether or not he is receiving adequate niacinamide treatment. Often there is a 
correlation between the patient's posture and his symptoms of bodily fatigue and joint 
discomfort, pain and disability, and therefore the physician must constantly analyze the 
patient's static and dynamic postures and make appropriate suggestions for the 
correction of faulty posture. A few commonly occurring types of static and dynamic 
postural abnormalities are described below, together with suggestions for their 
treatment. No general discussion of posture is included, since a number of excellent 
descriptions of what constitutes good posture are available in the literature (33) (84) 
(73).

It was observed that many patients who were making satisfactory recovery from severe 
or extremely severe joint dysfunction in response to adequate niacinamide therapy 
(even those who had reached the level of slight joint dysfunction or no joint dysfunction) 
had continuance or worsening of symptoms referable to hip and knee joints and to the 
muscles of their lower extremities, and that objectively, recovery of movement in hip and 
knee joints lagged behind recovery of movement in other moveable joints. When it was 
recognized that these patients were continuing to use habitually the abnormal posture 
described below, even though therapeutically increased ranges of joint movement 
permitted more efficient walking posture, appropriate suggestions were made for the 
correction of improper postures. When the patient taking adequate niacinamide therapy 
adopted these suggested changes in walking posture, he experienced some immediate 
relief from his symptoms and, in time, when the recommended posture became 
habitual, he usually became entirely free from symptoms referable to his hip and knee 
joints and to his lower extremity muscles, and the rate of recovery in the ranges of hip 
and knee joint movement was accelerated. Now that patients are routinely advised, as 
described below, to modify improper walking posture at the outset of niacinamide 
therapy, the continuance or accentuation of this pattern of articular and muscular 
symptoms of the lower extremities is seldom seen, and recovery of movement in hip 
and knee joints parallels that of other joints in response to adequate niacinamide 
therapy.

This commonly occurring postural abnormality of standing and walking results chiefly 
from sustained hypertonia of the quadriceps muscles, associated with various degrees 
of cocontraction (sustained hypertonia) of the flexor and adductor muscles of the thighs. 
At first this postural abnormality may occur only as an unconsciously adopted 
accompaniment of unresolved emotional problems, which initiate psychogenically in-
duced, sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle. In time, such postures and the 
sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle may become habitual, whether or not the 
patient continues to have unresolved emotional problems. In the standing position, the 
patient's muscles contract more forcefully than necessary to maintain his stance 
efficiently. In addition, the patient usually has increased pelvic tilt and increased lumbar 
lordosis, and holds his head in a forward position which accentuates the 
thoracicocervical curve. Any dorsal kyphosis the patient may have seems to become 
more prominent as a result of this abnormal posture. Often in this posture the patient's 
abdominal muscles become so lax that his abdomen becomes pendulous (6). In 
walking, the person with sustained muscular hypertonia tends to maintain the poor 
standing posture described above. In forward progression, he tends to inhibit the natural 
swinging movement of the arms. With each consecutive step, the ipsilateral trunk-thigh 
muscles elevate the thigh sufficiently to permit pendulum-like swinging of the entire 
ipsilateral lower extremity as a more or less rigid unit, with little or no associated knee 
movement. Upon simultaneous palpation of the anterior and posterior thigh muscles of 
the patient as he walks, it is possible for the physician to detect a high degree of 
cocontraction of antagonists and protagonists of the hip and knee joint movement 
without palpable relaxation of these thigh muscles during walking. It is tiring for the 
patient to stand and walk in the manner described above. He also experiences a sense 
of resistance to walking which he describes as dragginess, heaviness, weakness, 
unsteadiness and stiffness of the lower extremities. He may have pain, discomfort and 
stiffness in the muscles of his thighs, back and neck; there are often associated 
symptoms of discomfort, pain and disability in the hip and knee joints. In addition, the 
patient may have pain and discomfort in the joints of his lumbosacral region, in his 
upper thoracic spine, and in the cervical spine. He may have noticed that over a period 
of time he has become "round-shouldered," that it is hard for him to straighten up, and 
that his "stomach" has become more prominent. When such a posture is habitual for 
many years, the patient with joint dysfunction suffers from the steady state of the post-
traumatic articular syndrome, and is likely to develop arthritic changes in the various 
joint regions subjected to excessive mechanical trauma, resulting in part from improper 
alignment of joints, and in part from continuously sustained hypertonia of somatic 
muscle.

Such a patient is shown how to modify 'his gait so that he consciously lifts his feet, 
raising and flexing each knee alternately with each successive step, instead of walking 
stiff-kneed. He may notice at once that walking in this way is relatively effortless and 
comfortable as compared with his usual gait, which caused his lower extremities to feel 
draggy, heavy, weak, unsteady and stiff, and his thigh muscles to feel painful and 
uncomfortable. With this correction in gait, simultaneous palpation of anterior and poste-
rior thigh muscles will indicate that there is alternately well-coordinated contraction and 
relaxation of the opposing thigh muscles. When, in addition, the patient learns to hold 
himself as tall as possible in standing, walking and sitting, he may lose his pelvic tilt, 
lumbar lordosis and anterior neck flexion. The patient must practice the therapeutically 
suggested alterations in posture so that ultimately he habitually uses those static and 
dynamic postures which cause the least injury to his joints, and as a result he will no 
longer be troubled with symptoms from this type of improper p05ture. When a patient 
has marked limitation in ranges of movement of hip and knee joints before niacinamide 
therapy is instituted, he is unable to correct his gait in the manner suggested. When 
niacinamide-induced recovery permits sufficient increase in hip and knee movement, 
this correction of gait is possible. Occasionally, irreversible arthritic joint changes are 
present which make this improvement in posture mechanically impossible. 

Sacro-iliac Joint Strains. A patient with a history of recurrent sacro-iliac strains is given 
certain suggestions concerning posture which are often helpful in preventing 
recurrences of such strains: he should avoid twisting his trunk in the performance of any 
physical act while standing with his trunk bent at an angle of 35 to 55 degrees with his 
thighs, since this maneuver is frequently the cause of sacro-iliac strain. He should not 
"cross his knees" when sitting. He should not stand asymmetrically with most of his 
body weight resting on one foot. He should sleep on a non-sagging bed.

High Heels. Women who wear high-heeled shoes are likely to have postural back 
strains caused by compensatory lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, flexion of the neck and slight 
bending of the knees - all of which are necessary to maintain balance in the erect 
posture when high heels are worn. Some women wearing high-heeled shoes may have 
a steady state of back fatigue, discomfort and pain from such postural strains, while 
others may have these symptoms only when they are on their feet a great deal, or when 
they carry unaccustomed weights. Symptoms from postural strain are accentuated by 
the alternate wearing of high-heeled and low-heeled shoes. Women are advised to wear 
slippers and shoes having heels of uniform height, preferably low or medium heels.

Lifts. Often patients who were obliged to wear lifts continuously on their shoes to 
alleviate hip and knee discomfort prior to adequate niacinamide therapy found during 
niacinamide-induced recovery of joint mobility that discomfort of hip and knee joints 
increased in severity. However, when the lifts were removed, this discomfort 
disappeared.

Obesity. The excess weight of the moderately overweight patient increases mechanical 
injury of the weight-bearing joints (hips, knees, ankles, small joints of the feet). The 
excess weight of the markedly overweight patient causes more severe mechanical 
injury of these joints and, in addition, during standing and walking the patient has 
postural strain from balancing his heavy, often pendulous abdomen, and develops 
associated articular symptoms of fatigue, discomfort and pain in various portions of his 
back. Adequate weight reduction is part of the treatment of such patients with joint 
dysfunction, and a prerequisite for this is often the successful resolution of the patient's 
emotional problems (23) (138).

Painful Feet. A patient with painful feet may adopt awkward bodily postures which 
subject many joints of the body to excessive mechanical injury.

It is not uncommon to find that considerable foot pain is caused by the wearing of shoes 
which have unevenly worn heels or projecting irregularities of the insoles. A patient who 
habitually dorsifiexes his toes while wearing shoes, often develops considerable 
discomfort of the feet and legs. When such a patient is made aware that he habitually 
dorsiflexes his toes, he can eventually break himself of this habit, and he will be free 
from discomfort from this source.

During the course of adequate niacinamide therapy, a patient with joint tilt, 
dysfunction may develop considerable pain and discomfort in the ball of the foot and in 
one or more of the four small toes of the feet even though he has continued to wear 
footgear (shoes, slippers, socks or stockings) which was comfortable previously. When 
one foot is significantly longer than the other, the foot pain experienced during 
niacinamide therapy may be more severe in the longer foot, or present only in the 
longer foot.

As part of the progressive retrograde changes of untreated joint dysfunction, over a 
period of years many patients develop in the four small toes mild, moderate or marked 
deformities, consisting of partial flexion of the interphalangeal joints, and partial 
extension of the corresponding metatarsophalangeal joints; thus, one or more of the 
four small toes of each foot are "curled" to various degrees. Where there is a significant 
disparity in the length of the two feet, the "curling" of the toes of the longer foot is the 
more pronounced than that of the shorter foot. Such "curled" toe deformities are much 
more common in women than in men, presumably because the higher heels and 
narrower toe caps of women's shoes are additional factors which mechanically favor the 
formation of "curled" toes. With niacinamide-induced articular improvement, there is a 
gradual "uncurling" of the deformed toes, with virtual lengthening of the feet which is 
particularly prominent on weight-bearing. Consequently, footgear of a size entirely 
comfortable prior to niacinamide-induced joint reconstitution becomes painfully short, 
with resultant injury to the feet. When such an injury has taken place, the patient often 
complains of pain, burning, throbbing and swelling in the ball of the foot. These 
symptoms usually are most severe on the plantar surfaces of the second, third and 
fourth metatarsophalangeal joints. Examination reveals redness, swelling, heat and 
exquisite tenderness to digital pressure on the ball of the foot. There may be swelling, 
pain and redness of the interphalangeal joints of the four small toes. The skin of the 
dorsolateral surfaces of the fourth and fifth toes near the interphalangeal joints may be 
irritated, swollen, painful and reddened from rubbing against the lining of the shoes, and 
at times there may be, in addition, secondary infection. Callusing of the skin of the ball 
of the foot, and corns in the rubbed areas on the toes are commonly found.

The patient is advised to stay off his feet for several days, to immerse his lower 
extremities in hot Epsom salt solution up to the mid-calf region for 30 minutes three or 
four times a day, and to obtain footgear correctly fitted to his "new" foot size, measured 
to his foot size when he is in a standing, weight-bearing. position. At any time the 
wearing of footgear that is too small will cause a recurrence of this type of foot 
discomfort.

SOME EXAMPLES OF MECHANICAL JOINT INJURY

CASE U, No.178, female, age 43, housewife, married.

This patient, who had slight dysfunction (Joint Range Index 88.1) without arthritis, 
complained when first seen that she had had daily, for a number of years, pain, swelling 
and stiffness in the joints of her hands, more marked at all times in the right hand than 
in the left hand. She was unable to attribute her discomfort and disability to any specific 
act which might have injured her joints. Her articular symptoms were always much 
worse on Wednesdays and Thursdays, and by the following Monday were noticeably 
better, although she was never completely free from joint discomfort.

Upon questioning, it was found that for many years she ironed every Monday for about 
five hours continuously. When she was asked to demonstrate her method of ironing, it 
was observed that she exerted strong and persistent pressure in gripping the handle of 
the iron tightly with the fingers of her right hand, and exerted a strong downward 
pressure with her right wrist as she moved the iron back and forth. The left hand 
grasped the edge of the garment tightly between thumb and forefinger as she stretched 
the cloth in the course of her ironing. She stated that three or four days after ironing, her 
chief discomfort in the right hand was in the wrist and in all of the joints of the thumb 
and fingers. In her left hand, pain was limited to the wrist and the joints of the thumb and 
forefinger.

Since there seemed to be a causal relationship between the method of ironing and the 
patient's joint symptoms, she was advised to distribute her ironing through the week so 
that she would do no more than one hour of ironing on any one day. She was also 
instructed to use no more than the minimal muscular force necessary to perform her 
ironing.

After a month of such a program, she was free from articular pain, swelling and stiffness 
for the first time in many years. For three years she has had no difficulty referable to the 
joints of her hands and wrists, even though she continues to do the same amount of 
housework and ironing.

This patient had a post-traumatic pattern of persistent articular pain and disability 
resulting from repetitive episodes of mild joint trauma occurring every 7 days, with cyclic 
exacerbations of articular difficulties for 3 or 4 days after joint trauma was sustained.

CASE V, No.452, female, age 61, invalid, married.

When first seen, this patient had extremely severe joint dysfunction (Joint Range Index 
52.2) and severe rheumatoid arthritis, as well as a post-traumatic pattern of immediate 
and delayed articular pain, discomfort and disability resulting from a single episode of 
mild joint trauma.

She had performed what was for her the unusually difficult task of addressing 20 
envelopes for Christmas cards, holding the pen in her right hand. Ordinarily, her 
husband would have performed this service for her, but he was away on a business trip, 
and she did not wish to ask anyone else to relieve her of this obligation. When she 
completed her writing, she experienced uncomfortable cramps, fatigue and unusual 
stiffness in her right hand, which lasted for about 30 minutes. She was free from further 
unusual discomfort in her right hand until four days later, when she suddenly 
experienced severe, persistent articular pain and increased stiffness in the joints of her 
right thumb, first and second fingers, and, to a slightly lesser extent, in the joints of the 
fourth and fifth fingers. Her pain, articular swelling and stiffness persisted at a severe 
level for four days, with gradual subsidence of the delayed post-traumatic articular 
syndrome over a period of one month, which corresponded to her first month of 
niacinamide therapy. At the time of her second office visit, there was no evidence of the 
delayed post-traumatic articular syndrome.

CASE W. This 65-year-old woman accidentally cut the digitorum profundus tendon of 
her right forefinger 16 years before the photographs of Figure 35 were taken. At the 
time of the initial examination her Joint Range Index was 71.5, indicating moderate joint 
dysfunction.

Since the accident, the right forefinger could be flexed to a limited extent, and was 
moved during the course of her daily work, but not to a sufficient degree to be useful in 
the performance of household tasks. Thus, the right forefinger was not exposed to the 
more severe mechanical joint in-juries of housework and psychogenically induced, 
sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle. This patient was extremely right-handed, and 
grasped her various household implements with great force, probably because she did 
not have full use of her right forefinger.

There was no clinical evidence of impairment of innervation or circulation to the right 
forefinger. Sensations of heat, cold, pain, light touch, vibration, motion and position 
were normal in all the digits of the right hand. All the digits of the right hand were equally 
warm, and of the same color (210).

Because the interphalangeal joints of the right forefinger had been subjected to little 
mechanical injury, they had no articular deformities. However, the joints of other digits of 
the right hand were markedly deformed, presumably because of repetitive mechanical 
joint injury incurred by the tight grasping of household utensils, and by psychogenically 
induced, sustained hypertonia of somatic muscle. There was marked limitation of 
movement of the interphalangeal joints of the deformed digits, but not of the 
interphalangeal joints of the right forefinger.

CHRONIC ALLERGIC SYNDRONIES
Certain food-induced articular and non-articular allergic symptoms which are described 
below may obscure partially or completely a patient's subjective appreciation of 
improvement in response to adequate niacinamide therapy, even though objectively 
satisfactory improvement in joint function is demonstrated by continuously rising values 
of the Joint Range Index on serial re-measurements of joint ranges. While these allergic 
reactions usually do not include any significant degree of limitation in ranges of joint 
movement, they may be responsible for considerable articular pain and discomfort, in 
addition to other symptoms of bodily discomfort. It is, therefore, of considerable 
importance in the medical management of a patient with joint dysfunction to distinguish 
between the symptoms of aniacinamidosis, which are ameliorated in time by adequate 
niacinamide therapy, and allergic syndromes which are ameliorated in time only by 
elimination of the offending allergen, or by hyposensitization to the offending allergen.

Although many diverse clinical manifestations of food allergy may occur in persons with
joint dysfunction, three syndromes occur frequently in response to the ingestion of an 
offending food or foods: (a) Allergic Pain Syndrome (223) (167) (221), (b) Allergic 
Fatigue Syndrome (223) (167) (152) (153), (c) Allergic Mental Syndrome (223) (167) 
(151) (152) (153) (220) (40) (166) (213) (31) (165). These syndromes are described 
below. (Rarely, the allergic pain syndrome occurred when there was an active dental or 
tonsillar focus of infection, and was alleviated when the source of infection was 
eradicated. Only three examples of such benefit were observed in this series of 455 
cases.)

These syndromes may occur separately in various degrees of severity and chronicity, or 
in any combination, and may be associated with a number of allergic symptoms not 
specifically included in the description of these syndromes. Clinical manifestations of 
these allergic syndromes may appear almost immediately after the ingestion of an 
offending food material and may continue for a few hours or a few days; or they may 
appear after a latent period of 12-76 hours following the ingestion of the allergen, and 
continue for as long as two weeks, gradually decreasing in severity during this interval. 
The daily ingestion of an offending food or food material produces a more or less steady 
state of allergic symptoms, with some exacerbation of these symptoms soon after the 
ingestion of this food.

Clinical proof that a suspected food is responsible for a patient's allergic symptoms is 
obtained (a) when such symptoms disappear when the offending food material is 
completely excluded from his diet for a sufficient period of time (2-3 weeks), and (b) 
when there is a recurrence of the initial pattern of allergic symptoms upon ingestion of 
the offending food material soon after he has become symptom-free as a result of 
abstinence from the allergenic food for a sufficient period of time; i.e., before abstinence 
from the food has been sufficiently prolonged for hyposensitization to have occurred.

(In addition to these three syndromes of allergic food reaction, offending foods have 
caused in patients with joint dysfunction the following types of allergic symptoms, which 
could be produced by the ingestion of the offending food, and could be eliminated by 
complete avoidance of the offending food:

Skin: Hives, angioneurotic edema, chronic pruritus, chronic skin lesions
Mucous membranes: Angioneurotic edema, canker sores.
Eyes: Chronic conjunctivitis.
Head: Cephalgia, including migraine.
Respiratory tract: Sneezing, postnasal drip, vasomotor rhinitis, recurrent sore throats, 
recurrent colds, sinusitis, asthma.
Gastro-intestinal: Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and cramps, heartburn, water 
brash, diarrhea, bilious attacks.)

While the ingestion of any food material can produce allergic symptoms in allergic 
persons, certain foods (chocolate, citrus fruits, tomato, pineapple, whole wheat, corn, 
milk, eggs and nuts) seem to be the most frequent offenders in the production of the 
allergic syndromes described below.

An oral threshold dose of an offending food is defined as the smallest quantity of that 
food which, when ingested not oftener than once every two weeks, will produce allergic 
symptoms in a person sensitive to this food. An oral sub-threshold dose of an offending 
food is defined as that amount ingested not oftener than once every two weeks which 
will produce no clinically discernible allergic reactions in a person sensitive to this food. 
However, if sub-threshold doses of a single offending food are eaten daily by a person 
who is sensitive to this allergenic food in threshold doses, in a few days or weeks there 
may be precipitated a clinically obvious allergic reaction, which probably represents the 
summation of clinically inapparent allergic reactions which have reached an intensity 
exceeding the threshold for the production of allergic symptoms.

If sub-threshold amounts of several offending foods are eaten on the same day, an 
allergic reaction to these may occur, even though such foods when eaten separately on 
different days do not give rise to a clinically apparent allergic reaction. It has been noted 
that single sub-threshold doses of different offending foods ingested on consecutive 
days may precipitate a clinically obvious allergic reaction.

In many persons with severe food allergies, the amount of the offending food which 
precipitates clinically significant allergic reactions is so small that every trace of this food 
must be eliminated from the patient's diet if he is to have relief from his allergic 
symptoms.

When an offending food is eliminated from the diet for a sufficiently long period of time, 
the tolerance gained with clinical hyposensitization may be excellent and apparently 
unlimited; or it may be moderate and easily broken down, either by too frequent 
ingestion of the food in small or moderate amounts, or by the single ingestion of an 
excessive quantity of this food; or, the tolerance may be so slight that it may be easily 
broken down by the single ingestion of a very small amount of the offending food 
material.

Whether or not the patient has a personal or family history of allergy, at any time he 
may become sensitized to any food and have any pattern of food-induced allergic 
symptoms, which may vary in severity, chronicity and extensiveness from time to time 
(158) (159) (160).

Transient sensitization to certain foods has been observed in many patients with upper 
respiratory infections ("colds") who have a continuance of their acute coryza, malaise 
and lymphadenopathy as a result of a practice widely used in the treatment of "colds," 
particularly, during the early days of the "cold," namely, the ingestion daily of a quart or 
more of such liquids as citrus fruit juices, pineapple juice, tomato juice, milk and choco-
late milk. When a person with a limited tolerance for these food materials takes these 
liquids in larger quantities than usual for him, his oral threshold dose is exceeded, and 
an allergic tissue reaction is produced which resembles that of "infectious colds." Often, 
this food-induced allergic reaction prolongs "cold-like" symptoms for several weeks. 
However, when the patient eats his usual diet and takes 8 to 10 glasses of water daily 
instead of large quantities of the above fluids, this food-induced allergic reaction is 
avoided and the patient recovers much more rapidly from his "cold."

Cyclic food resensitization is likely to occur when certain foods in season are eaten daily 
in ordinary or excessive amounts; e.g., tomatoes, citrus fruits, pineapple, strawberries, 
peaches, melon, corn; and hyposensitization is likely to occur when these foods are not 
in season, and the patient excludes them from his diet, or limits the amounts ingested. 
To avoid cyclic resensitization, an allergic patient is advised to vary his diet as much as 
possible throughout the year, and not to have too frequent or excessive ingestion of any 
one food (158) (159) (160).

Sometimes a patient with pollinosis will observe during his hay fever season that his 
reactions to known allergenic foods tend to be more severe, and that certain foods, 
which he could ingest with impunity at other seasons, give rise to allergic food reactions. 
Conversely, the ingestion of certain foods during his hay fever season may worsen his 
symptoms of pollinosis.

Extremes of environmental temperature occasionally increase the severity of the 
patient's reaction to the ingestion of an allergenic food.

A given food may cause allergic symptoms only when the patient is emotionally 
disturbed; or, a person who reacts to the ingestion of an allergenic food may react more 
violently if this food is ingested at a time when he is emotionally disturbed. Many 
patients suffering from severe allergic symptoms have considerable secondary anxiety 
concerning their allergic ailment, and often associated psychosomatic symptoms are so 
severe that they dominate the clinical picture, and the patient is considered to be 
psychoneurotic.

Excessive ingestion or excessive retention of dietary sodium tends to make the allergic 
reaction to allergenic foods more severe (99).

In women, a cyclic variation in the allergic pattern has been noted, so that clinical 
evidence of food allergy may occur only during the two weeks before, but not during the 
two weeks after, the menstrual period; or, food-induced allergic symptoms may be 
present throughout the month, but accentuated during the two weeks before the period 
(223) (167).

Allergic Pain Syndrome. In certain allergic persons, the ingestion of a threshold amount 
of an offending food material causes primarily mild, moderate or severe generalized 
pain in somatic muscle, tendon, periosteum, and periarticular and articular structures. A 
patient experiencing the allergic pain syndrome avoids all unnecessary physical 
exertion, since ordinary physical activity causes him pain and discomfort. Physical 
examination may disclose tenderness to palpation of somatic muscle, tendon, 
periosteum and periarticular structures. When the blood pressure cuff is inflated during 
the measurement of blood pressure, the patient may spontaneously complain of severe 
pain in the muscles of his arm. Somatic muscle is hypotonic and feels flaccid. Active 
and passive movement of joints may cause articular pain. The pain of this syndrome is 
usually not alleviated by the ingestion of aspirin, and if the patient is allergic to aspirin, 
the ingestion of this drug may even be responsible for the initiation and continuance of 
his allergic pain syndrome. Body massage usually worsens his pain and discomfort. In 
persons having the allergic pain syndrome, relatively slight mechanical joint injury will 
evoke severe and prolonged symptoms and signs of the delayed post-traumatic 
articular syndrome.

Allergic Fatigue Syndrome. In certain allergic persons, the ingestion of a threshold 
amount of an offending food material causes primarily extreme muscular fatigue, which 
is often associated with cervical lymphadenopathy (rarely, generalized 
lymphadenopathy), lymphocytosis and hypothermia (although occasionally there is a 
moderate elevation in temperature). Physical activity intensifies this allergic fatigue, but 
prolonged rest does not relieve the patient's symptoms of fatigue.

Allergic Mental Syndrome. In certain allergic persons, the ingestion of a threshold 
amount of an offending food material causes primarily mental symptoms, including 
mental fatigue, depression and confusion. The person may complain of disagreeable 
"mental fogginess or haziness," "a feeling of partial anesthesia," or a "feeling of being 
drugged." Thought processes are slowed. The patient may have unwarranted irritability, 
unreasonableness, temper tantrums, loss of memory, inability to concentrate, 
restlessness, sleepiness (although occasionally insomnia is noted). The patient’s mental 
inertia may be so severe that he finds it difficult to make decisions about even 
uncomplicated matters. He vacillates, procrastinates, and has trouble in carrying out 
even the simplest plans that he has made. He may require long naps during the day 
and may sleep long hours at night without relief from such mental fatigue. He knows 
that "something is wrong" with him, and he can describe his pattern of mental 
symptoms, although usually he is reluctant to do so because such symptoms have been 
made light of by his family and friends. A patient may refuse to discuss his pattern of 
allergic mental symptoms with the physician at the time of the initial visit, fearing that 
such symptoms are indicative of mental disease (insanity). He often complains that "life 
is not worth living” feeling this way.

The allergic patient with this mental syndrome may be secondarily disturbed because 
his family and physicians consider him to be a chronic grumbler and complainer. He 
feels emotionally insecure because he has been unable to obtain therapeutic relief from 
his allergic symptoms. Often such a person, with the tentative diagnosis of 
"psychasthenia," "neurasthenia," "nervous exhaustion," "psychoneurosis," or 
"psychosomatic fatigue," is referred to a psychiatrist, who, after studying the patient, be-
lieves that the patient's problems are psychosomatic in origin, not realizing that food 
allergy has created a somatopsychic disorder, which can be corrected by the removal of 
the offending food material from the patient's diet, but not by psychotherapy.

A few patients with joint dysfunction have, in addition to the allergic mental syndrome, a 
primary neuropsychiatric disturbance. In such in-stances, treatment must include 
adequate niacinamide therapy, exclusion of the offending food material from the diet 
and expert psychotherapy.

TREATMENT OF CIIRONIC ALLERGIC FOOD SYNDROMES

Skin testing was rarely used in attempting to identify allergenic foods, since false-
negative scratch or intracutaneous skin reactions may be obtained for a given food or 
group of foods, the ingestion of which causes the patient to experience clinically 
important allergic reactions, and falsepositive skin reactions may be obtained for food 
materials, the ingestion of which is clinically well tolerated by the patient (167) (152) 
(153) (151) (158) (159) (160) (81) (150).

Elimination diets, especially the diets of Rowe (167) (171), were used and modified 
empirically as necessary in the attempt to rid the patient of his food-induced allergic 
symptoms. At times, it may be extremely difficult to select a basic elimination diet which 
will accomplish this. When symptoms due to food allergy are not abated in 7 to 14 days, 
the patient is probably allergic to one or more foods in the elimination diet. While an 
elimination diet containing few foods sometimes gives relief from allergic symptoms, the 
too-frequent ingestion of the small number of foods in such a diet favors sensitization of 
the patient to any of the allowed foods. When new foods are added to the patient's basic 
elimination diet after he has been free from his chronic allergic food symptoms for two 
weeks, the patient should keep an accurate food-symptom diary which permits the 
physician to assess the patient's clinical reactions to the ingestion of the newly added 
food materials. If any added food seems to be giving rise to allergic symptoms, its use is 
interdicted. The patient's elimination diet is liberalized as rapidly as possible by the 
addition of those foods which by trial he is able to ingest repeatedly without 
experiencing allergic symptoms. It is possible at any time for an allergic patient to 
become sensitized to foods that formerly he tolerated well, and when symptoms 
suggestive of allergic reaction to the ingestion of foods recur, it is necessary to resume 
the search for offending food materials.

The polypropeptan method (223) of specific desensitization to twelve basic foods was 
given a limited trial, and good results were obtained in some patients. The food-
symptom diary was useful in observing the clinical effects of specific desensitization, 
and the patient's reaction to the subsequent addition of new foods not included in the 
basic list of twelve foods. When the ingestion of new foods caused allergic symptoms, 
and specific propeptans were available for treatment, the patient was desensitized to 
these foods; when specific propeptans were not available, the use of these foods was 
interdicted.

The method of individual food-testing advocated by Rinkel and others (159) (155) was 
not employed.

At times the antihistaminics were employed as palliative measures in the treatment of 
hay fever symptoms and of certain pruritic skin conditions (hives, contact dermatitis). 
The chronic allergic food syndromes described in this volume did not seem to respond 
to treatment with antihistaminic drugs.

While it is tedious and time-consuming for the patient to keep an accurate food-
symptom diary, and for the physician to analyze such a diary, this method of clinical 
investigation has been most helpful in the identification of specific foods causing allergic 
symptoms, and in the evaluation of the patient's response to elimination of allergenic 
foods from his diet. Some patients were unwilling or unable to cooperate in keeping a 
food-symptom diary and in restricting their diet as suggested. About 70% of persons 
who had symptoms suggestive of chronic allergic food syndromes were willing and able 
to cooperate in this exacting program.

The diary is kept in a standard stenographer's notebook, with a central dividing line on 
each page. Each notebook page contains the record of one day only. The diet (including 
all snacks, condiments and food-tasting) and the time of ingestion of each meal are 
noted in sequence in the left-hand column of each page. The patient is instructed to be 
specific in his description of the types of food eaten and, wherever possible, to list the 
ingredients of such mixtures as soups and salads. In the right-hand column, the patient 
lists his complaints, including the time of onset, degree of severity and duration of 
symptoms. A diary which is carelessly kept or has